Gentile | 18-26




Positive Approaches Journal - Volume 2 Title

Volume 9 ► Issue 2 ► 2020


Behavior Change in Individuals with Intellectual/Developmental Disability

Julie P. Gentile, M.D.


Introduction

Individuals with intellectual disabilities (IDD) often have limited expressive language skills and may communicate critical information to those around them through their behavior. Intellectual disability is characterized by limitations in both intellectual function and adaptive behavior, which may include practical and social skills. A comprehensive assessment should be performed to determine the etiology of the disability and the appropriate services to support the individual.1 As Sigmund Freud stated, “All behavior is purposeful.” It is the job of clinicians, caregivers and family members to determine the etiology of behavior. A change in behavior may indicate a medical condition, a psychiatric illness, medication intolerance, or a host of other issues. It is the critical detective work that we perform that will reveal the etiology of behavior change. Behavior is not a problem; it is a form of communication. Literature shows that behavior change in ID often indicates medical or mental health conditions; it is vital that we facilitate timely identification of accurate diagnoses and treatment for same.2 Despite advances in preventive and medical care, age at death remains lower and mortality rates higher for persons with ID.1 Older adults with IDD carry a higher mortality risk relative to the general population, mainly attributable to respiratory, central nervous, and circulatory systems.

Assessment: The Biopsychosocial-Developmental Model

The biopsychosocial model is useful when attempting to determine the etiology of behavior change in a person with IDD.1 It is important to gather information from the individual, family, caregivers, clinical records, and collaborating agencies. The assessment can evolve over time and incorporates supporting, predisposing, perpetuating, and protective factors related to the disorder. In the assessment of behavior change in an individual with IDD, it is important to provide an environment most likely to de-escalate the situation. Use a calm, soothing tone, express concern, offer food or drink, allow trusted persons to be present when able, remove potentially dangerous objects and distract with positive activities. Avoid overcrowding individuals or exposing them to loud noises, addressing only the caregiver, concealing hands in pockets, using intimidating direct eye contact or a confrontational stance, and unnecessarily invading personal space. It is important to talk both directly to the individual and to obtain collateral information from others present.3 Care in the approach to the situation can help the provider obtain accurate and complete information for the assessment.

Biological Component

The biological aspects of the assessment will include information such as demographics, medical history, genetics, family history, medication trials, and substance use.4 Especially important is a medication timeline and a medication history that includes medications the individual was taking at a time when he or she was doing well. Ask questions about when the individual was most recently doing well and collect as many details of that point of reference. We must know what the highest level of functioning is and how to achieve that in the present. The timeline of medication trials is important, as individuals with IDD are more susceptible to medication side effects. It is also important to remember that externalized behavior may be a way for an individual to communicate about a current medical illness, so documentation by caretaking staff can be helpful to determine an underlying biological cause of the aggressive behavior.5

Psychological Component

Family history of violence, whether potentially genetically influenced or a learned behavior, is a predisposing factor, as individuals who experience violence regularly at a young age are more likely to be aggressive. Psychological data obtained should also include trauma history, information regarding developmental years, losses and significant transitions, environmental changes, past counseling relationships, and an individual’s coping skills.

Social Component

Social outlets are important for persons with IDD, and it is imperative they feel safe in their environments. Data should be gathered about residential placements, social activities, hobbies and interests, spirituality, spending money, exercise and activity, and feelings of safety.

Developmental Component

Individuals with IDD will usually present within the context of the developmental stage in which they live.1,6 IDD is categorized as profound/severe, moderate, or mild, which is often an indicator of the level of dependency needs and expressive language capability of the individual. Generally, individuals with mild cognitive deficits live in the community in supported residential situations and participate in life-long supported employment or programming. Persons in the moderate category will most often need varying levels of support from their families or community agencies. Because their expressive language skills are typically more limited, they are at higher risk for inability to communicate subjective complaints using speech about mental health and medical illnesses.1 Individuals with severe/profound IDD are more likely to have very high levels of dependence on external supports and to have associated medical conditions, with most individuals requiring assistance for all aspects of life. Significant medical complications, such as seizure disorders, swallowing difficulties, speech impairments, and reduced life expectancies are more common for persons in the profound impairment category.

Obtaining the history

- Always start evaluation with the individual—even if it is as simple as having them express how they feel in the moment. The evaluation should start and end with the individual

- Be mindful of the communication barriers faced by individuals with IDD and that responses may take longer to formulate than individuals who are neurotypical. Patience is key

- Use simple vocabulary and avoid complex sentence structures

- Start with very concrete concepts like food or other basic needs and workshop/daytime habilitation activities and build from there

- Sequencing chronological events is often a struggle for the individual but asking for caregivers to help frame reported events can be helpful

- Limitations of attention, physical impairments including bowel/bladder incontinence to even pain may limit an extensive interview

- “Problem behaviors” may in fact be a medical condition that needs to be addressed such as high blood sugar leading to frequent urination, which can be interpreted as the individual “attention-seeking” as opposed to a physical need5,6

Conclusion

Individuals with IDD are at a significantly higher risk of having comorbid medical, genetic, and psychiatric conditions that in turn place them at greater risk for medical conditions involving every organ system. Individuals with IDD are less likely to be afforded access to traditional preventative guidelines and treatment methods. The barriers to treatment must be overcome. It is well documented that neurotypical individuals with severe and chronic psychiatric illnesses have greatly reduced life expectancy. Since many individuals with communication deficits exhibit behavioral changes or acute psychiatric symptoms when experiencing medical conditions, the mental health clinician often plays a vital role in facilitating access to appropriate care.

 

Table 1.3

Clinical Pearls for Navigating Medical Evaluation

Consider having individuals weighed at home in a more familiar environment. The individuals who are unstable when standing or have comorbid physical disabilities may require a larger scale with more support.

‘White coat hypertension’ might be more prevalent in people with IDD. Portable electronic blood pressure may work well. Home monitors can measure the blood pressure in a relaxed familiar environment.

Blood draws may be best performed in familiar environments. For cholesterol and glucose testing it is sometimes acceptable to use finger stick measurements. Studies have shown that finger stick measurement is acceptable for screening purposes especially in low to moderate risk individuals younger than 65 years.

Screen for cerumen as the first step in hearing screening. Individuals can then have a basic hearing test either in a primary care office or with an audiologist as needed.

Sedation or anesthesia may be required for routine procedures like dental work, endoscopic procedures or minor surgery.

Menstrual related psychopathology: consult the OBGYN to discuss regulation of menstrual periods. Have a lower tolerance to use of NSAIDs for menstrual related changes.

If individuals have any chronic pain condition, rule out exacerbation at the onset of any problem behavior as well as PCP exam and lab work up.


Table 2.7

Clinical Pearls for Navigating Medical Evaluation

Diabetes Mellitus

Sensory Deficits

- Screen for glucose monitoring early and more frequently

- Consult nutrition for poor feeding skills, FTT, obesity, growth retardation, metabolic disorders


- Assess vision/glaucoma once for age < 40 (< 30 for DS), and then q2yr

- Assess hearing q5yr after age 45 (q3yr for DS)

- Screen for subclinical hearing impairment or undetected cochlear pathology

Pulmonary

Gastrointestinal

- Be careful of high risk of recurrent respiratory problems due to muscular weakness, ineffective cough, decreased airway clearance, inadequate lung capacity

- Risk factors: drooling, feeding problems, GERD, aspiration, spasticity, scoliosis

- Vaccinate for H. influenza & S. pneumonia

- Be watchful for GERD, constipation (med side effect), fecal impaction, aspiration, malnutrition, pica, colonic volvulus & pseudo-obstruction (acute abdomen), reflux esophagitis (GIB)

- Risk factors: cerebral palsy, IQ < 35, scoliosis, anticonvulsants, BZD, non-ambulatory

Menstruation

Cancer

- Encourage regular GYN visits

- Be aware of mood/behavior changes + abnormal bleeding

- Transdermal patch > OCP, Depo shot > IUD

- Side effects of anticonvulsants & antipsychotics can affect cycling and nutrition

- NSAID = pain, self-mutilation, aggression (caution for GI upset)

- SSRI = severe mood/physical symptoms in PMS/PMDD

- Colon CA screening (early detection is difficult due to constipation)

- Prostate CA screening (same as general population)

- Breast CA screening (decreased parity and breastfeeding, physicians’ lack of adherence)

- Cervical CA screening (based on sexual and FHx)


Table 3

Common Presentation of Behavior Change and Possible Etiologies

Fist jammed in mouth: consider gastroesophageal reflux disease, eruption of teeth, asthma, rumination, nausea, anxiety, painful hands, and gout.

Biting side of hand: consider sinus problems, Eustachian tubes/other ear problems, eruption of third molars, dental problems, pain or paresthesia of the hands.

Biting objects with front teeth: sinus problems [also the most common reason for thumb sucking and bruxism], Eustachian tube or ear problems, finger pain or paresthesia, and gout.

Intense rocking: visceral pain, headache, depression, anxiety, or medication side effects.

Refuses to sit evenly, or at all: hip pain, genital or rectal discomfort, clue to ongoing or past abuse.

Unpleasurable masturbation: prostatitis, urinary tract or genital infection, rectal injury or infection, parasitic infection, syphilis or other ‘old’ conditions, repetition phenomenon [past abuse], or never learned pleasurable masturbation.

Waving head side to side: attempt to supplement visual field, vertigo, or hypervigilance.

Walking on toes: arthritis in the hips, ankles, or knees, sensory integration issues or tight heel cords.

Won't sit: akathisia, anxiety, depression, back pain or other pain, sleep deprivation.

Whipping head forward: Atlantoaxial subluxation [found in 14% of individuals with Down syndrome and others with joint laxity], dental problems, or headaches.

Sudden sitting down or ‘sit down strikes’: cardiac problems, syncope, orthostasis, medication side effects, vertigo, otitis, Atlantoaxial subluxation, seizures, or panic.

Waving fingers in front of eyes: migraine, corneal scarring, cataracts, seizures, glaucoma, or medication side effects i.e. diplopia.

Head banging: depression, headache, dental problems, seizures, otitis, mastoiditis, sinusitis, tinea capitis.


References

  1. Gentile JP and Monro M. Medical assessment. Psychiatry of Intellectual Disability: A Practical Manual. Gentile JP, Gillig PM, eds. Chichester, UK: Wiley and Sons, 2012. 26-50/51(abstract page).
  2. McCarthy J and O’Hara J. Ill-health and intellectual disabilities. Current Opinion Psychiatry. Sep 2011; 24(5):382-6. doi: 10.1097/YCO.0b013e3283476b21.
  3. McDermott S, Moran R, Platt T and Dasari S. Variation in health conditions among groups of adults with disabilities in primary care. Jrl of Community Health, Vol. 31, No. 3, June 2006. Pages 147-159.
  4. Ryan R. Intensive conference on dual diagnosis. The Community Circle, Denver, CO. CME Event July 2003.
  5. Sullivan WF, Heng J, Cameron D, et al. Consensus guidelines for primary health care of adults with developmental disabilities. Canadian Family Physician 2006;52: 1410-1418.
  6. van Timmeren EA, van der Putten AA, van Schrojenstein Lantman-de Valk HM, van der Schans CP, Waninge A. Prevalence of reported physical health problems in people with severe and profound intellectual and motor disabilities: A cross-sectional study of medical records and care plans. J Intellect Disabil Res. 2016 Nov;60(11):1109-1118. doi: 10.1111/jir.12298. Epub 2016 May 20.
  7. Wilkinson JE, Culpepper L, Cerreto M. Screening tests for adults with intellectual disabilities. Jrl Am Board Fam Med 2007; 20:399-407.

Biography

Julie P. Gentile (jen-TILL-ee), M.D. is Professor and Chair at Wright State University Department of Psychiatry and is the Project Director for both Ohio’s Coordinating Center of Excellence in Mental Illness/Intellectual Disability and Ohio’s Telepsychiatry Project for Intellectual Disability. Dr. Gentile is a Distinguished Fellow of the American Psychiatric Association and has evaluated more than 4,500 individuals with IDD. She has been awarded over $8,000,000 in grant funding to support her dual diagnosis projects and is the recipient of the American Psychiatric Association’s Menolascino National Award for Excellence in Psychiatric Services for Developmental Disabilities.

Contact Information

Julie P. Gentile MD, DFAPA

Professor and Chair

Wright State University

Boonshoft School of Medicine

Department of Psychiatry

2555 University Blvd. Suite 100

Campus South

Dayton, OH 45435

937-775-7792